|
|
| Home: Ask for It : Preparing a Proposal : Who Can Be a PI? |
 |
|
| • Contacts & Services | • Sending It Off |
| • Preparing the Proposal | • Revisions & Negotiations |
| • Jumping Through the Hoops at Duke | • Workshops & Training |
|
|
|
||
| Who Can Be a PI? | |
|||
| Faculty
Handbook Sample Request Letter Policy on Principal Investigator Status The status of principal investigator (PI) or Program Director (PD) is granted as a matter of privilege to tenured and tenure-track faculty, regular faculty on the research and "practice of" tracks, and select senior administrators. All other appointments must receive permission from their deans or the Provost. Those who wish to be co-principal investigators (Co-PI's) must meet the same criteria as PIs and PDs. If a funding mechanism is designed to support individual graduate students, such as NSF's Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Program, an eligible faculty member, usually the student's advisor, must serve as the PI and the student is listed on the proposal as a co-PI. This is the one exception to the policy. Securing PI Status Permission to serve as a PI may be granted by the applicant's dean. In schools without departments, such as Divinity or Environment, a letter should be prepared by the Dean which approves PI status for the prospective PI. The letter should clearly state if PI status is being awarded for the current proposal only or if permission extends to any of the applicant's future proposals. The letter should be addressed to: Judith Dillon, Director Office of Research Support 334 North Building Box 90077 When the prospective PI is from a department, program, institute or center, the department chair or the director of the program/insitute/center must prepare a letter of request to the appropriate dean. The sample letter, available in Microsoft Word, includes the required information. The Dean may simply endorse the letter of request and forward it to ORS at the address above, or, if preferred, prepare an original letter. Letters approving PI status are internal documents and will not be forwarded to sponsors. Outside
Collaborators and PI Status Obviously an outside collaborator is not a Duke faculty member and does not "automatically" have PI status nor would he or she have an on-going contractual relationship with Duke. The reason for not allowing this, however, goes beyond these two issues to the contractual relationships between Duke and it's sponsors. The institutional signature on a proposal, indicates compliance with the terms and conditions of the grant if an award is made. The signature also certifies that the University - and it's principal investigators - are in compliance with numerous federal regulations such as the use of human and animal subjects, misconduct in science, conflict of interest, lobbying, affirmative action, cost accounting standards, to name a few. Signing a proposal that lists outside collaborators as co-PIs would imply that Duke can certify compliance for other insitutions and their faculty members when clearly we cannot. Consequently, we require that outside collaborators be recognized in other ways in a proposal. Alternatives for working with and recognizing the key roles of faculty from other institutions include collaborative proposals, subcontracts and consultancies. |
||||
 |
||||
|
||||